Humanly: Conversational AI for When You're Hiring Humans in Bulk
Tool: Humanly What it does: Conversational AI for candidate screening, scheduling, and engagement via chat and SMS Pricing: Starts around $500-1,000/month (user reviews suggest $8,000-$20,000 annually depending on volume) Best for: Mid-market companies hiring 100-500 people annually for hourly or entry-level roles
Humanly is what happens when someone looks at Paradox's Olivia and thinks "we can build something similar for companies who don't have enterprise budgets." The result is conversational AI recruiting that's legitimately useful and more accessible than the enterprise options.
Here's the premise: candidates engage with Humanly's AI through text message or web chat. The AI screens candidates, schedules interviews, answers questions, and keeps people engaged throughout the hiring process. You get the time savings and candidate experience benefits of conversational AI without needing to convince your CFO that recruiting technology deserves a six-figure investment.
Humanly has positioned itself as the conversational AI recruiting platform for everyone else—mid-market companies, growing startups, and organizations that need automation but aren't hiring thousands of people quarterly.
What Humanly Actually Does
The platform covers the high-friction recruiting tasks:
Chat-Based Screening: Humanly conducts screening conversations via SMS or web chat. The AI asks qualifying questions, evaluates responses, and scores candidates. User reviews indicate the conversations feel natural rather than robotic, which improves completion rates versus traditional forms.
Automated Scheduling: The AI handles interview coordination—checking candidate availability, syncing with hiring manager calendars, sending invitations, and managing rescheduling requests. User reviews mention this alone justifies the investment for teams scheduling 20+ interviews weekly.
Candidate Engagement: Humanly sends status updates, answers common questions, and keeps candidates informed throughout the process. User reviews indicate this reduces candidate drop-off because people feel engaged rather than forgotten.
Integration with Your ATS: Humanly connects with major ATS platforms to pull candidate information and push screening results. User reviews mention the integrations work reasonably well but sometimes require technical setup assistance.
What Users Say Actually Works
G2 and Capterra reviews highlight real benefits:
The conversational approach improves candidate experience. User reviews consistently mention positive feedback from candidates who prefer texting with an AI to filling out lengthy applications. For hourly and shift-based roles, meeting candidates where they are (on their phones) matters.
Time savings are measurable. Teams using Humanly report spending 40-60% less time on screening and scheduling. User reviews from retail, hospitality, and healthcare recruiters indicate being able to handle significantly more hiring volume without adding headcount.
Implementation is faster than enterprise alternatives. Unlike Paradox which can take months to implement, user reviews suggest getting Humanly operational in 4-8 weeks. The platform is more templated and less customizable, which means faster deployment.
Pricing is accessible for mid-market. While not cheap, Humanly's pricing model is designed for companies hiring 100-500 people annually rather than enterprise-scale operations. User reviews indicate costs are roughly half of Paradox for similar basic functionality.
The Limitations Worth Understanding
Now let's be honest about tradeoffs:
Humanly is less sophisticated than Paradox. User reviews comparing the two platforms note that Paradox's Olivia handles more complex conversations and edge cases better. Humanly's AI sometimes struggles with unexpected candidate responses or multi-step logic. You're trading some capability for lower cost.
Customization is limited. The conversational flows are template-based, which makes implementation faster but limits flexibility. User reviews mention wanting more control over conversation logic and branding but being constrained by platform limitations.
You'll need to monitor the AI's performance. User reviews indicate Humanly requires ongoing optimization—reviewing conversations, adjusting screening questions, and refining response patterns. The AI doesn't magically improve without human oversight.
Integration quality varies. While Humanly connects to major ATS platforms, user reviews mention occasional sync issues and limitations on what data flows between systems. You might need workarounds for edge cases.
Who Should Actually Look at Humanly
Be specific about fit:
Humanly makes sense if:
- You hire 100-500 people annually, especially for hourly or entry-level roles
- Screening and scheduling consume significant recruiter time
- Your budget allows $10K-$20K annually for recruiting automation
- You want conversational AI benefits without enterprise pricing
- Candidate engagement and speed matter competitively
Humanly probably isn't right if:
- You hire fewer than 50 people annually
- Your roles require deep, nuanced evaluation
- You need highly customized conversational flows
- You can afford enterprise platforms like Paradox
- Your candidates strongly prefer traditional application processes
Alternatives Worth Considering
If Humanly doesn't quite fit:
Paradox - More expensive but more sophisticated if you have enterprise budget and volume.
TextRecruit - Candidate texting platform without full conversational AI, lower price point.
Goodtime - If scheduling is your primary pain point, focused solution might be better.
The Bottom Line
Humanly delivers legitimate value for mid-market recruiting teams. The conversational AI works well for straightforward screening and scheduling. Candidates appreciate the text-based engagement. Recruiters appreciate the time savings.
It's not as sophisticated as enterprise platforms, but that's the tradeoff for accessible pricing. User reviews from companies hiring 100-500 people annually are generally positive—the platform does what it promises at a price point that makes sense for their hiring volume.
The key is having realistic expectations. Humanly excels at automating repetitive tasks for high-volume hiring. It's not going to replace human judgment for complex roles or handle every edge case perfectly.
If you're a mid-market company spending too much time on screening and scheduling, Humanly is worth evaluating. If you're enterprise-scale or hiring primarily for specialized positions, you need something more sophisticated.
Know your hiring volume and budget before starting the conversation. It'll determine whether Humanly is the right fit or whether you need to look at enterprise alternatives.
Sources:
AI-Generated Content
This article was generated using AI and should be considered entertainment and educational content only. While we strive for accuracy, always verify important information with official sources. Don't take it too seriously—we're here for the vibes and the laughs.